Page 133 - Prathima Volume 12
P. 133

m%;sudk Ydia;%Sh ix.%yh
                    2018$2019  fodf<diajk fj¿u


                    Youth can be viewed as one of the key social groups that engage with SNS in daily life
                    as they are keener to embrace new technologies than other groups of the society.
                    Technology  for  youth  functions  as  an  agency  of  'emotions,  cognition  and  social
                    patterns' (Khalid, Jayasainan & Hassim, 2018). Stu dies by Bolton et al. (2013),
                    Brosdahl and Carpenter (2011) highlight that youth utilize SNS to 'regularly interact,
                    seek entertainment and moderate feelings with each other' (Khalid, Jayasainan &
                    Hassim, 2018). Of the different types of SNS used by youth, some of the commonly
                    used  SNS  are  Facebook,  Instagram,  Pinterest,  Google  Plus, WeChat, WhatsApp,
                    Twitter, Tumblr and QZone (Brosdahl and Carpenter, 2011). Of these, Facebook and
                    Instagram are recognized as the most attractive and records higher user rates. This is
                    mainly due to the interactive features of the two sites where users are given the
                    opportunity to interact with much freedom and intimacy with others (Brosdahl and
                    Carpenter, 2011). Simultaneously, through search functions users are able to connect
                    with like-minded communities. It is in such a landscape, that youth no longer require
                    much assistance from  the literal world  in  requesting recommendations on  varied
                    topics and can rely on the digital space. In addition to this, SNS are used by individuals
                    and groups as a platform to educate users about choices of food, travel, clothing, etc.

                    In the current digital practices among users, recording consumer dining experiences
                    via  online  reviews  and  social  media  posts  have  become  a  social  trend  which  is
                    supported by fellow users who utilize the reviews to seek new dining experiences
                    (Ariyasriwatana  &  Quiroga,  2014).  This  social  trend  is  also  transformed  into  a
                    marketing strategy by novel eateries to promote their products via food reviews.
                    Studies highlight that food obsessions for which SNS are utilized are referred to as
                    #foodporn (Mejova et al., 2016). It is in this context that social media influencers
                    (SMIs) emerge as individuals or groups who share their food related experiences
                    among a large number of followers. This study attempts to evaluate the influence of
                    social media influencers (SMIs) on the youth in Sri Lanka with specific reference to
                    food consumption. The analysis attempted to trace the consumption patterns and the
                    role of the SMIs within a larger cultural context.

                    2. Literature Review


                    Within the Sri Lankan context, the usage of SNS can be considered ubiquitous. Of a
                    population of about 21 million, over 6.71 million use the internet and over 6 million are
                    active on SNS. Of this, the majority of the users can be considered as youth who
                    mainly engage in Facebook, WhatsApp, Viber and Google Plus (SoravJain, 2018).
                    The emergence of a social media influencer culture has a very short history where
                    individuals have taken on the role of SMIs mainly for food and travel in the urban parts
                    of Colombo influenced by the Western global trends of the social media influencer
                    persona. While, SMIs are gaining popularity and more social acceptance in the digital
                    spaces, this still remains a novel concept to the majority of the population expect for
                    the youth who endorse and engage with SMIs on different levels.


                                                           119
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138