Page 193 - RUICHSS 2023 Proceeding
P. 193

University of Ruhuna                                          ISSN: 2706-0063
               Matara, Sri Lanka

               such as exhaustive literature reviews and judicious document analysis. The

               literature  review  had  served  to  proffer  an  overarching  survey  of  extant
               scholarly works delving into the impact of colonialism on Sri Lanka's religious

               milieu.  Simultaneously,  document  analysis  had  facilitated  a  trenchant

               examination of primary sources, facilitating the discernment of salient themes
               and  patterns  characterising  British  colonial  policies  and  practices  vis-à-vis

               diverse religious communities within Sri Lanka.


               For  data  analysis,  the  study  had  employed  the  rigorous  methodological

               framework of thematic analysis. This approach had involved the meticulous
               identification and subsequent analysis of emerging patterns and overarching

               themes within the dataset. These themes had then been marshaled to address
               the research inquiries effectively and derive cogent conclusions concerning

               the enduring impact of colonialism on Sri Lanka's religious landscape, along
               with its implications for societal inclusivity.



               To  ensure  the  veracity  and  dependability  of  the  research  findings,  a
               multifaceted set of measures had been rigorously implemented. Initially, the

               researchers had conducted a comprehensive review of the scholarly literature

               to corroborate the grounding of the research inquiries in existing scholarship.
               Subsequently,  the  processes  of  data  collection  and  analysis  had  been

               undertaken meticulously, adhering to established research protocols. Lastly,
               the research findings had been subjected to peer review and thoroughgoing

               evaluation by eminent scholars in the field to validate the research's alignment
               with the most exacting standards of academic rigour and scholarly integrity.
                                                   134
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198