Page 142 - Prathima Volume 12
P. 142

m%;sudk Ydia;%Sh ix.%yh
                    2018$2019  fodf<diajk fj¿u
                    However, by the year 2009, 84.8% of the population of the country had facility to safe
                    drinking water and 35% had the access to pipe borne water (Central Bank Report,
                    2009). Even though water supply and sanitation coverage had increased in many
                    developing countries including Sri Lanka, there is an uneven progress between rural
                    and urban areas (Hutton and Bartram, 2008 & World Bank, 1998). In the Sri Lankan
                    context, most of the population is largely rural segments with about 81.52% percent
                    living in rural areas in 2018, according to the report of the World Bank collection of
                    development indicators (World Bank, 2018).

                    Many rural people suffer without safe water and proper sanitation in most of the
                    villages in Sri Lanka, especially in the selected coastal villages in the Akkaraipattu
                    region,  Ampara  district  of  Sri  Lanka.  The  selected  villages  namely;  Pottuvil,
                    Lahugala, Alayadivembu and Navithanveli, where community-based water supply
                    projects have been implemented by the National Water Supply and Drainage Board
                    (NWSDB) with the participation of CBOs in order to reduce water crisis.

                    The Government of Sri Lanka is very keen on implementing many programs and
                    policies to control water crisis in rural segments. Some remarkable achievements have
                    been made in the water supply and sanitation sector in Sri Lanka over the last decade.
                    The government's continued efforts to improve national social development indicators
                    have placed the country ahead of most other South Asian countries. Provision of
                    drinking water supply and sanitation is a government priority and periodic targets have
                    been set for the proportion of the population that should have access to safe drinking
                    water  and  improved  sanitation  services  (Fan,  M,  2015).  Thus,  the  community
                    participation is one of the key measures which is keenly followed by the government in
                    successful  water  deficiency  reduction  programs.  Many  activities  have  been
                    implemented in eradicating water dearth with the participation of local communities,
                    especially  CBOs.  And  these  activities  have  been  planned  to  implement  in-
                    collaboration with the Ministry of Water Supply and Drainage, National Water Supply
                    and  Drainage  Board  (NWSDB)  and  the  Department  of  Community Water  in  the
                    island-wide.

                    At  the  same  time,  the  government  and  non-governmental  organizations  have
                    implemented various rural water supply projects during the last two decades in order
                    to control water crisis. In this effort, they have tried to use participatory approaches
                    and utilize community-based organizations to provide them better services to the rural
                    communities in providing safe drinkable water. Access to safe and clean drinkable
                    water is an indicator of development sort in terms of health, nutrition and societal
                    upgrades. However, many rural areas in developing countries have lack of access to
                    good, quality, and affordable water due to various factors.  In this backdrop, this study
                    paved its attention to understand the role of CBOs and institutional motivation for
                    mitigating rural water crisis in the coastal areas of the study community. Therefore,
                    this study significantly explores why community participation in relation to CBOs

                                                           128
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147