Page 125 - Prathima Volume 12
P. 125

A Review of Postcolonial Scholarship: Conducting Research on Culture and Society


                    As a result, these new methods are purely phenomenological and existential in relation
                    to studying society and culture. Also, these new methods enable one to decolonize the
                    study location and its culture from the colonial representations. In addition to digital
                    ethnography  in  anthropology,  some  anthropologists  employ  cultural  mapping
                    methods in ethnographic research (Crawhal, 2007; Poole, 2003). Cultural mapping is
                    a research technique in studying how people perceive place, space, time, and memory
                    (Jones & Garde Hansen, 2012; Kingsolver, 2011; Rodman, 2010). Likewise, Crawhal
                    (2007)  defines  it  as  a  “cultural  mapping”  that  “involves  the  representation  of
                    landscapes in two or three dimensions from the perspectives of indigenous and local
                    peoples” (2007: 2). To investigate further, cultural mapping (Crawhal 2007) will play
                    a crucial role in defining the place and cultural knowledge of a community. Cultural
                    mapping is not merely cartography of a place, but a place that goes beyond the notions
                    of soil, wood, and different commodities. However, this claim does not ignore the
                    significance  of  these  commodities  in  people's  life,  but  anthropologists  should
                    demonstrate  how  people  relate  them  to  their  place  and  people.  Furthermore,
                    anthropologists intend to study how cultural mapping can become a good participatory
                    research technique, which enables researchers to learn intercultural dialogues and
                    conversations.

                    Thus,  cultural  mapping  represents  the  landscape  from  a  native  point  of  view
                    (perspectives of indigenous and local people). In particular, UNESCO has adopted this
                    research method as a potential technique for mapping out local landscape and cultural
                    resources. UNESCO has paid great attention to cultural mapping projects directed by
                    indigenous  communities  to  convey  cultural  knowledge  that  would  enable  the
                    management  of  cultural  resources.  In  a  similar  vein,  Pool  (2003)  illustrates  that
                    cultural  mapping  or  cultural  landscape  mapping  usually  focuses  on  documenting
                    cultural diversity, local resources, networks, and cultural heritage, but I would claim
                    that this method will also enable anthropologists to re-think the history of places and to
                    understand  people's  local  knowledge  of  living  places.  For  instance,  spatial
                    anthropology and cultural geographers use this method to explain how people invest
                    themselves in material objects (temples, houses, schools, community centers, wells,
                    etc.) that are part of their places. Through such cultural mapping, researchers will be
                    able to document peoples' cultural knowledge of place. Even though Pool (2003) did
                    not discuss the role of internal differences in cultural mapping, anthropologists need to
                    consider  internal  differences  in  terms  of  gender,  class,  caste,  and  age  in  cultural
                    mapping.



                                                           111
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130