Page 413 - RUICHSS 2023 Proceeding
P. 413

University of Ruhuna                                                          ISSN: 2706-0063
               Matara, Sri Lanka

                8. Conclusions


                The overall aim of the present research was to identify the barriers that hinder educational

                inclusion for SWDs through the perceptions of undergraduates concerning their peers with

                disabilities:  with  special  reference  to  the  Faculty  of  Humanities  and  Social  Sciences,
                University of Ruhuna. Based on the descriptive statistical analysis, results emphasised that

                the majority of the students help their SWDs peers, but they have not obtained any training
                related to supporting  peers with  educational needs  after getting  registered for university

                education.  Since  the  majority  of  the  respondents  are  in  the  2000  and  3000  levels,  such

                activities to understand the SWDS as peers should be introduced or implemented.


                Therefore, it can be concluded that universities have not executed the required programmes
                to address the knowledge gap about SWDs and the operation of care and support services for

                SWDs.  To  increase  knowledge  of  certain  problems  and  make  them  public,  it  suggests
                awareness campaigns targeted largely at selected target groups. The same condition was

                supported by the research findings of Rosa-Eva Valle-Flórez, Ana Mara de Caso Fuertes,

                Roberto Balelo, Sheila Garca-Martn, Jessica L. Sniatecki, Holly B. Perry, and Linda H. Snell
                (Sniatecki et al2015) & (Valle-Flórez, et al., 2021).


                The results of the factor analysis highlighted four categories that should be addressed since

                they include varying degrees of impediments to inclusive education in relation to the research

                location.  The first factor (FI), which consists of eight factors, is accessibility and resources
                available in institutions to support inclusion. Six factors make up the second factor (F2),

                which is about the academic staff’s readiness to accommodate SWDs' requirements. Six
                elements make up the third factor (F3), which is the actual implementation of the curriculum

                modifications. Eight factors make up the fourth component (F4), which is the interactions

                and engagement of SWDs and their classmates.  Through those elements, each component
                emphasised  how  it  was  developed  to  address  the  primary  challenges  that  needed  to  be

                conquered. By 2021, Rosa-Eva Valle-Flórez, Ana Mara de Caso Fuertes, Roberto Balelo,
                and  Sheila  Garca-Martn  conducted  prior  studies  that  support  this  theory,  which  is  also


                                                           354
   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418